Innovations in Cell Counting Technology: The Rise of Automated Counters

Cell counting is essential in laboratory and medical applications, serving as a cornerstone for research, diagnostics, and quality control. Accurate cell quantification enables scientists and clinicians to evaluate growth rates, study cellular responses, and monitor disease progression.

Traditionally, manual methods like using hemocytometers have been the standard for cell counting, yet advancements in technology have shifted the focus towards automation, enhancing both speed and accuracy.

Automated cell counters have transformed laboratory practices by streamlining cell analysis. These sophisticated devices process samples rapidly, reducing the potential for human error and improving reliability.

In this blog, we will make basic comparison between manual and automatic cell counting, analyze common pitfalls when using automatic cell counters, and introduce the cell counting slides, a necessary accessory used in most counters.

1. The Basics of Cell Counting

Accurate cell counting is crucial for evaluating cellular populations. The traditional method is to use the hemocytometer, which consist of a thick glass slide with a defined grid pattern etched into its surface.

When using hemocytometers, users dilute the sample (typically with a trypan blue solution that helps distinguish live cells from dead ones) and pipette it onto the hemocytometer. The sample spreads across the chamber, and cells within a defined volume are counted under a microscope.

This method, while effective, is time-consuming and prone to user variability.

A hemocytometer
A hemocytometer. Photo taken by Todd from Flickr

The Automatic Way

In contrast, automatic cell counters enhance efficiency and reliability. They employ advanced technologies, such as image analysis, fluorescence, and impedance, to quantify cell populations swiftly and accurately.

Users prepare samples and load them into the device. Depending on the model, this may involve using a reusable or disposable chamber slide. The counter then capture images of the cells and analyzes them, generating results such as total cell count and viability percentage.

This automation minimizes manual handling, and therefore minimizes potential human errors.

An automated cell counter
A Countess™ automated cell counter by Thermo Fisher. Image generated by BioRender.

2. Manual vs. Automated Cell Counting

When comparing manual counting using hemocytometers with automated cell counters, several key differences emerge.

Hemocytometers require meticulous manual counting and can be subject to user error, particularly when it comes to sample loading and identifying cells. While they are relatively low-cost and accessible, the time commitment and potential for variability in results can be significant drawbacks.

In contrast, automatic cell counters offer rapid analysis, capable of processing multiple samples in a fraction of the time it takes to manually count cells. They also reduce operator fatigue and improve consistency in measurements.

Automated devices typically provide higher accuracy due to their reliance on advanced algorithms and imaging technologies, minimizing the variability often seen with manual methods. Additionally, many models can analyze cell morphology and viability simultaneously, offering a more comprehensive overview of the sample.

Method Advantages Disadvantages
Manual (Hemocytometer)
  • Cost-effective for small laboratories.
  • Hands-on approach enhances understanding of cellular samples.
  • Time-consuming process.
  • Subject to user error and variability.
Automatic Counter
  • Rapid analysis; processes multiple samples quickly.
  • Enhanced accuracy through advanced algorithms.
  • Minimizes operator fatigue.
  • Can analyze cell morphology and viability simultaneously.
  • Higher initial cost.
  • May require training for effective use.

3. Common Mistakes to Avoid with Automatic Cell Counters

While automatic cell counters greatly enhance efficiency and accuracy in cell counting, improper use can lead to erroneous results. Recognizing and avoiding common pitfalls is essential for optimal performance.

A. Misloading Samples

Improperly loading samples into the counter results in inaccurate cell counts or failed analyses. This can occur if the sample volume is incorrect or if it doesn’t fill the chamber adequately. To avoid this, always follow the manufacturer’s guidelines for sample volume and loading techniques.

B. Inadequate Calibration

Automatic cell counters require regular calibration to ensure their accuracy. Failing to calibrate the device according to the manufacturer’s specifications can lead to significant discrepancies in results. Establish a routine calibration schedule and adhere to it, especially after maintenance or when using a new type of sample.

C. Not Following Manufacturer Instructions

Each automatic cell counter has specific operational protocols. Ignoring these guidelines can compromise the quality of the data. Users should thoroughly read the user manual and familiarize themselves with the recommended procedures for setup, operation, and maintenance to maximize the instrument’s performance.

D. Misinterpreting Results

Finally, users may misinterpret the results generated by automatic cell counters, particularly if they are not familiar with the output metrics. Proper training and ongoing education can help users effectively analyze and interpret results, leading to better decision-making in research applications.

4. Cell Counting Slides for Automatic Counters

The cell counting slide is an accessory used by automatic counters during the procedures. Prepared samples are loaded into the chambers on a slide, which is then inserted into the counter (a holder may also be required in the process) for analysis.

Cell counting slides have different models, each specifically designed for respective cell counter models. Hence, it is essential to acknowledge which slides are intended for your counters. Most cell counter products have their corresponding slides sold together, and equivalent slides may also be produced by third-party manufacturers at either a cheaper price or a better quality, or both.

For example, WelchLab’s Cell Counting Slides for LUNA is an alternative to Logos Biosystem's LUNA™ Cell Counting Slides, compatible with LUNA-II, LUNA-FL, LUNA-FX5 cell counters, and CELENA® S digital imaging system. Other slides of WelchLab serve as alternatives to Bio-Rad's and Thermo Fisher's, respectively.

WelchLab slide for LUNA automated cell counter
WelchLab's alternative slide for Logos Biosystem's LUNA series automated cell counter.

Some companies also provide selections from disposable and reusable slides. Disposable cell counting slides allow for quick sample changes, without the need for cleaning or maintenance, and minimize cross-contamination risks. These make disposable slides a more efficient solution, especially for labs processing large numbers of samples.

Reusable cell counting slides, on the other hand, are more environment and cost friendly in the long run. They require thorough cleaning and sterilization between each use to reduce the threat of contamination, adding an extra manual work to users.

In a word, laboratories should evaluate their workflow to decide between disposable and reusable options, balancing efficiency and budget.

Conclusion

The shift towards automated cell counting technologies has revolutionized laboratory practices. By carefully following manufacturer’s instructions in maintenance, calibration and operation, loading samples properly and with corresponding counting slides, and correctly interpreting the results, it will be easy for any researcher to embrace automatic counters in cell counting.

Disclaimer: Countess is a trademark of Thermo Fisher Scientific; LUNA, LUNA-II, LUNA-FL, LUNA-FX5, and CELENA S are trademarks of Aligned Genetics, Inc. (Logos Biosystems). Welch Materials, Inc. is not affiliated with Thermo Fisher, Logos Biosystems, Bio-Rad, Flickr, BioRender, or any of their subsidiaries or their affiliates.

Back to blog